A Bibliometric Analysis of English Reading Assessment from 2019 To 2023

Authors

  • Hamida A Jasin Universitas Khairun
  • Hijril Ismail Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Edi Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Muslimin Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Muhammad Fauzi Bafadal Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Dedi Yusuf Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Keywords:

Assessment; Bibiometrict Analysis; English; Reading; English Reading Assessment

Abstract

The aim of this research is to provide an extensive literature review on English reading assessment. Articles were retrieved using the Publish or Perish software and the Scopus database, with journal quality verified through ScimagoJR.com (Q1–Q4 classifications). A total of 184 articles published between 2019 and 2023 were analyzed. References were organized and summarized using Mendeley, while article classification was conducted using VOSviewer software. Six clusters were identified: Cluster 1 consisted of seven keywords (English, factor, grade, impact, influence, language, and student); Cluster 2 included six keywords (assessment, development, patient, quality, readability, and use); Cluster 3 comprised four keywords (ability, child, focus, and reading); Cluster 4 included four keywords (comprehension, computer, dynamic assessment, and second language); Cluster 5 consisted of three keywords (accuracy, comparison, and review); and Cluster 6 comprised four keywords (artificial, intelligence, meta-analysis, and systematic review).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alice Chen, M. R., Hwang, G. J., Majumdar, R., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2023). Research trends in the use of E-books in English as a foreign language (EFL) education from 2011 to 2020: a bibliometric and content analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2411–2427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1888755

Anes Boubris, A., & Haddam, F. (2020). Reading Assessment: A Case Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Classroom Evaluative Practices. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.16

Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J. H., Eckert, T. L., Fefer, S. A., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72(May 2018), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004

Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522

Escher, S. E., Kamp, H., Bennekou, S. H., Bitsch, A., Fisher, C., Graepel, R., Hengstler, J. G., Herzler, M., Knight, D., Leist, M., Norinder, U., Ouédraogo, G., Pastor, M., Stuard, S., White, A., Zdrazil, B., van de Water, B., & Kroese, D. (2019). Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project. Archives of Toxicology, 93(12), 3643–3667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7

Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 162). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

Günaydin, Y. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Interactive Reading. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 20(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2023.23042

Harris, C. J., Krajcik, J. S., Pellegrino, J. W., & DeBarger, A. H. (2019). Designing Knowledge-In-Use Assessments to Promote Deeper Learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12253

Hilaikal, F., & Ayu, M. (2023). The Implementation of SQ3R in Helping Students’ Assessment in Reading Class at SMAN 1 Adiluwih. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 4(1), 53–57. http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/index

Ismail, H. (2021). A Bibliomretric Analysis of Reading Strategy (Databases Scopus and Google Scholar 2016-2021 ). Conference, Uhamka International, December, 2–3.

Ismail, H., & Edi, E. (2021). a Bibliometric Analysis of Efl Reading Fluency From 2016 To 2021. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5364

Kazakoff, E. R., Macaruso, P., & Hook, P. (2018). Efficacy of a blended learning approach to elementary school reading instruction for students who are English Learners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9565-7

Meitifazahra, A., Suryaman, M., & Wachyudi, K. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis: E-Book and Reading Comprehension in Efl in the Last Decade. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 10(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v10i1.638

Middleton, K. V. (2020). Educational Measurement - 2020 - Middleton - The Longer‐Term Impact of COVID‐19 on K 12 Student Learning and Assessment.pdf. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(3), 41–44.

Midilli Sarı, R., & Eyüboğlu, H. (2023). Reading the Older People Researches in Architecture through Bibliometric Analysis (1975-2022). Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 54(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.22097

Mohamedi-Amaruch, A., & Rico-Martín, A. M. (2020). Assessment of reading comprehension in primary education: Reading processes and texts. Lenguas Modernas, 55, 37–52.

Sasalia, O. A., & Sari, F. M. (2020). Utilizing Novel in the Reading Class To Explore Students’ Viewpoint of Its Effectiveness. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i2.606

Sobral, S. R. (2021). Two decades of research in e-learning: A deep bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(9), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.9.1541

Taylor, R. L., Cooper, S. R., Jackson, J. J., & Barch, D. M. (2020). Assessment of Neighborhood Poverty, Cognitive Function, and Prefrontal and Hippocampal Volumes in Children. JAMA Network Open, 3(11), E2023774. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23774

Watling, C. J., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 53(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645

Wyant, J. D., Keath, A., & Baek, J.-H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis informed reading list for physical educators. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202214054

Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

A Jasin, H., Ismail, H., Edi, Muslimin, Fauzi Bafadal, M., & Yusuf, D. (2025). A Bibliometric Analysis of English Reading Assessment from 2019 To 2023. English Teaching and Applied Linguistics Journal, 2(1), 11–26. Retrieved from https://journal.risaglobal.org/index.php/etalj/article/view/75

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.